Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from Cuba Male Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Latvia
Immigrants from Cuba
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Latvia
Immigrants from Cuba
10.9%
MALE DISABILITY
85.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
128th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.9%
MALE DISABILITY
90.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
118th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from Cuba Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,739,259 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.514 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 325,990,586 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.126 and weighted average of 10.9%, a difference of 0.63%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Latvia | Immigrants from Cuba |
| Minimum | 2.7% | 3.8% |
| Maximum | 37.7% | 19.5% |
| Range | 35.1% | 15.7% |
| Mean | 12.6% | 10.5% |
| Median | 10.8% | 10.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.9% | 8.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.1% | 12.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 4.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.5% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.4% | 2.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Cuba by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latvia are Immigrants from Philippines (10.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Brazilian (10.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Macedonian (11.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Ukraine (10.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Fiji (11.0%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Cuba are Armenian (10.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Eastern European (10.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Africa (10.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (10.9%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Ghana (10.9%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.0 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Central Americans | 92.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 92.2 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 91.8 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Eastern Europeans | 90.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 90.2 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Armenians | 90.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 89.4 /100 | #120 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.2 /100 | #121 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 88.4 /100 | #123 | Excellent 10.9% |
| South American Indians | 88.1 /100 | #124 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 88.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 86.9 /100 | #126 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 86.8 /100 | #127 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 85.5 /100 | #128 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 85.4 /100 | #129 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Brazilians | 85.4 /100 | #130 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Macedonians | 84.2 /100 | #131 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 84.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Ugandans | 83.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 11.0% |