Immigrants from Latvia vs Costa Rican Male Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Latvia
Costa Rican
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Latvia
Costa Ricans
10.9%
MALE DISABILITY
85.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
128th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
MALE DISABILITY
78.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
145th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Latvia vs Costa Rican Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,739,259 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.514 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,572,614 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.213 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 0.71%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Latvia | Costa Rican |
| Minimum | 2.7% | 4.3% |
| Maximum | 37.7% | 29.6% |
| Range | 35.1% | 25.3% |
| Mean | 12.6% | 13.1% |
| Median | 10.8% | 11.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.9% | 9.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.1% | 13.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 3.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.5% | 6.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.4% | 6.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Latvia and Costa Ricans by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latvia are Immigrants from Philippines (10.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Brazilian (10.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Macedonian (11.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Ukraine (10.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Fiji (11.0%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Kenyan (11.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Korean (11.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Moroccan (11.0%, a difference of 0.23%), Arab (11.0%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Sudan (11.0%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 86.9 /100 | #126 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 86.8 /100 | #127 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 85.5 /100 | #128 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 85.4 /100 | #129 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Brazilians | 85.4 /100 | #130 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Macedonians | 84.2 /100 | #131 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 84.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Ugandans | 83.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Bhutanese | 83.4 /100 | #134 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 83.3 /100 | #135 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 82.8 /100 | #136 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 82.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Nigerians | 81.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 11.0% |
| South Africans | 81.7 /100 | #139 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 81.5 /100 | #140 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Arabs | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 81.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Moroccans | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Kenyans | 78.1 /100 | #144 | Good 11.0% |
| Costa Ricans | 78.0 /100 | #145 | Good 11.0% |
| Koreans | 77.5 /100 | #146 | Good 11.0% |