Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from Congo Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Latvia
Immigrants from Congo
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Latvia
Immigrants from Congo
3.1%
HEARING DISABILITY
12.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
208th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
78.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
145th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from Congo Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,736,493 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.673 and weighted average of 3.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,119,695 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.042 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 7.9%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Latvia | Immigrants from Congo |
| Minimum | 0.16% | 0.95% |
| Maximum | 17.1% | 5.3% |
| Range | 17.0% | 4.3% |
| Mean | 4.1% | 3.0% |
| Median | 3.6% | 3.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.3% | 2.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.0% | 3.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 0.79% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 0.77% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.0% | 0.77% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Latvia by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latvia are Immigrants from Hungary (3.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Cape Verdean (3.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Romanian (3.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Pakistani (3.1%, a difference of 0.33%), and Hispanic or Latino (3.1%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Iraqis | 19.0 /100 | #201 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 16.4 /100 | #202 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 16.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 15.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 3.1% |
| Alsatians | 15.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 3.1% |
| Eastern Europeans | 15.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 3.1% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 12.7 /100 | #208 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 12.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 3.1% |
| Cape Verdeans | 12.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 3.1% |
| Romanians | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 3.1% |
| Pakistanis | 11.1 /100 | #212 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 10.5 /100 | #213 | Poor 3.1% |
| Australians | 8.1 /100 | #214 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Bangladeshis | 8.1 /100 | #215 | Tragic 3.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Congo by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Congo are Brazilian (2.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Tongan (2.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (2.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Russia (2.9%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Panama (2.9%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
| Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
| Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |