Immigrants from Latin America vs Tsimshian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Latin America
Tsimshian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Latin America
Tsimshian
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
11.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
215th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
344th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Latin America vs Tsimshian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 558,117,601 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latin America and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.018 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,626,544 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.395 and weighted average of 8.8%, a difference of 40.3%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Latin America | Tsimshian |
Minimum | 2.4% | 4.1% |
Maximum | 13.5% | 25.7% |
Range | 11.1% | 21.5% |
Mean | 6.2% | 10.2% |
Median | 6.2% | 8.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.7% | 6.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.5% | 13.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.86% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.4% | 5.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.4% | 5.2% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Latin America by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latin America are Immigrants from Mexico (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Canadian (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Yugoslavian (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Guamanian/Chamorro (6.3%, a difference of 0.050%), and Mexican American Indian (6.3%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Laos | 13.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 6.3% |
Samoans | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 6.3% |
Mexican American Indians | 12.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 6.3% |
Japanese | 12.0 /100 | #213 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 11.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 11.0 /100 | #215 | Poor 6.3% |
Canadians | 10.9 /100 | #216 | Poor 6.3% |
Yugoslavians | 10.9 /100 | #217 | Poor 6.3% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 10.6 /100 | #218 | Poor 6.3% |
Indonesians | 9.9 /100 | #219 | Tragic 6.3% |
Immigrants | Albania | 9.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 6.3% |
Hungarians | 9.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 6.3% |
German Russians | 9.4 /100 | #222 | Tragic 6.3% |
Demographics Similar to Tsimshian by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Puerto Rican (8.9%, a difference of 0.59%), Tohono O'odham (8.7%, a difference of 0.97%), Kiowa (8.6%, a difference of 2.5%), Creek (8.5%, a difference of 4.4%), and Houma (9.3%, a difference of 5.5%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.9% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.0% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.0% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.2% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.2% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.2% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.3% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.5% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.6% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 8.7% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 8.8% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 8.9% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 9.3% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 9.5% |