Immigrants from Jordan vs Bahamian Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Jordan
Bahamian
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Jordan
Bahamians
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
83.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
140th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
88.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
124th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Jordan vs Bahamian Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,270,296 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.229 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,647,902 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Bahamians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.137 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 1.0%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Jordan | Bahamian |
| Minimum | 0.34% | 0.49% |
| Maximum | 6.7% | 8.0% |
| Range | 6.3% | 7.5% |
| Mean | 2.9% | 2.8% |
| Median | 2.9% | 2.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.4% | 2.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.4% | 3.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.92% | 1.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.99% | 1.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.98% | 1.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Jordan and Bahamians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Subsaharan African (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bahamians are Immigrants from Zaire (2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Albania (2.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Liberian (2.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Sudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.19%), and South American Indian (2.9%, a difference of 0.40%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Liberians | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 88.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bahamians | 88.6 /100 | #124 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 88.5 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 87.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.9% |
| South American Indians | 86.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 86.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 86.6 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |