Immigrants from Ethiopia vs Turkish Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ethiopia
Turkish
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Ethiopia
Turks
5.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
17th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
37th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Ethiopia vs Turkish Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 211,510,765 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ethiopia and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.194 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,801,732 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.130 and weighted average of 5.5%, a difference of 2.3%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Ethiopia | Turkish |
| Minimum | 0.17% | 0.92% |
| Maximum | 8.4% | 11.5% |
| Range | 8.2% | 10.6% |
| Mean | 4.9% | 5.7% |
| Median | 4.9% | 5.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.3% | 4.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.5% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 2.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.4% | 2.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.4% | 2.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ethiopia and Turks by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ethiopia are Immigrants from Sri Lanka (5.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Indian (Asian) (5.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Ethiopian (5.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Kuwait (5.4%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Israel (5.4%, a difference of 0.50%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Malaysia (5.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Afghan (5.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Asia (5.5%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Pakistan (5.5%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Australia (5.5%, a difference of 0.40%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Turks | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 5.5% |