Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Tongan Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Tongan
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Tongans
3.1%
HEARING DISABILITY
15.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
204th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
78.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Tongan Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,448,522 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.509 and weighted average of 3.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,876,442 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Tongans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.095 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 7.2%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Tongan |
| Minimum | 0.83% | 1.4% |
| Maximum | 13.9% | 13.0% |
| Range | 13.0% | 11.7% |
| Mean | 4.7% | 3.3% |
| Median | 3.7% | 2.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.9% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.7% | 3.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 0.97% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.8% | 2.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.8% | 1.9% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Alsatian (3.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Denmark (3.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Eastern European (3.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Thailand (3.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and Hispanic or Latino (3.1%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 20.6 /100 | #197 | Fair 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 20.5 /100 | #198 | Fair 3.1% |
| Syrians | 19.2 /100 | #199 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 19.1 /100 | #200 | Poor 3.1% |
| Iraqis | 19.0 /100 | #201 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 16.4 /100 | #202 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 16.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 15.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 3.1% |
| Alsatians | 15.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 3.1% |
| Eastern Europeans | 15.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 3.1% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 12.7 /100 | #208 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 12.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 3.1% |
| Cape Verdeans | 12.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 3.1% |
| Romanians | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 3.1% |
Demographics Similar to Tongans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Tongans are Brazilian (2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Congo (2.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (2.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Russia (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Panama (2.9%, a difference of 0.25%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
| Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
| Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
| Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 71.5 /100 | #154 | Good 2.9% |