Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Tongan Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Costa Rica
Tongan
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Costa Rica
Tongans
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
84.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
78.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Tongan Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 204,259,714 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Costa Rica and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.124 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,876,442 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Tongans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.095 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 0.87%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Costa Rica | Tongan |
| Minimum | 0.86% | 1.4% |
| Maximum | 6.8% | 13.0% |
| Range | 6.0% | 11.7% |
| Mean | 3.2% | 3.3% |
| Median | 2.8% | 2.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.5% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.6% | 3.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.1% | 0.97% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.3% | 2.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 1.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica and Tongans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica are Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Jordan (2.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.10%), and Soviet Union (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tongans are Brazilian (2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Congo (2.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (2.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Russia (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Panama (2.9%, a difference of 0.25%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
| Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
| Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |