Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Tongan Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Tongan
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Tongans
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
98.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
68th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
51st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Tongan Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,413,823 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.288 and weighted average of 2.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,891,232 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Tongans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.092 and weighted average of 2.0%, a difference of 1.6%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Tongan |
| Minimum | 0.52% | 0.85% |
| Maximum | 10.1% | 6.9% |
| Range | 9.6% | 6.1% |
| Mean | 2.6% | 2.3% |
| Median | 1.9% | 2.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.7% | 1.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.9% | 2.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 0.96% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.8% | 1.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.8% | 1.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Tongans by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Immigrants from Northern Africa (2.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Russian (2.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Argentina (2.0%, a difference of 0.21%), Maltese (2.0%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Greece (2.0%, a difference of 0.34%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tongans are Afghan (2.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Latvian (2.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Serbia (2.0%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Belarus (2.0%, a difference of 0.42%), and Macedonian (2.0%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Latvians | 99.5 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Afghans | 99.5 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Tongans | 99.5 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.4 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 99.3 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Laotians | 99.3 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Jordanians | 99.2 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Somalis | 99.2 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 99.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Argentineans | 99.1 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 99.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 99.1 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Armenians | 99.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.0 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Maltese | 98.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 98.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 98.8 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.7 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Russians | 98.6 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 2.0% |