Immigrants from Cabo Verde vs Japanese Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Cabo Verde
Japanese
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Cabo Verde
Japanese
3.0%
HEARING DISABILITY
56.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
170th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.0%
HEARING DISABILITY
46.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
178th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Cabo Verde vs Japanese Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 38,139,523 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cabo Verde and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.112 and weighted average of 3.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,105,269 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.363 and weighted average of 3.0%, a difference of 1.0%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Cabo Verde | Japanese |
| Minimum | 2.0% | 0.75% |
| Maximum | 5.4% | 11.9% |
| Range | 3.4% | 11.1% |
| Mean | 3.1% | 3.9% |
| Median | 2.9% | 3.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.5% | 2.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.4% | 3.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.92% | 1.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.82% | 2.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.82% | 2.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Cabo Verde and Japanese by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Cabo Verde are Immigrants from Ukraine (3.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Arab (3.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Armenian (3.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Greece (3.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Eastern Europe (3.0%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Immigrants from Philippines (3.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Panamanian (3.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Romania (3.0%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Moldova (3.0%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Sweden (3.0%, a difference of 0.34%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 64.8 /100 | #164 | Good 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 64.2 /100 | #165 | Good 3.0% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 62.9 /100 | #166 | Good 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 58.1 /100 | #167 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 57.9 /100 | #168 | Average 3.0% |
| Arabs | 57.6 /100 | #169 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 56.9 /100 | #170 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 56.6 /100 | #171 | Average 3.0% |
| Armenians | 56.0 /100 | #172 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 51.1 /100 | #173 | Average 3.0% |
| Indonesians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 48.4 /100 | #175 | Average 3.0% |
| Panamanians | 47.0 /100 | #176 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 46.4 /100 | #177 | Average 3.0% |
| Japanese | 46.0 /100 | #178 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 43.1 /100 | #179 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 42.4 /100 | #180 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 41.5 /100 | #181 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 41.1 /100 | #182 | Average 3.0% |
| Bulgarians | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 37.4 /100 | #184 | Fair 3.0% |