Immigrants from Fiji vs Japanese Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Fiji
Japanese
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Fiji
Japanese
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
67.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
160th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.0%
HEARING DISABILITY
46.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
178th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Fiji vs Japanese Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,738,910 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Fiji and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.381 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,105,269 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.363 and weighted average of 3.0%, a difference of 2.1%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Fiji | Japanese |
Minimum | 1.4% | 0.75% |
Maximum | 3.9% | 11.9% |
Range | 2.5% | 11.1% |
Mean | 2.9% | 3.9% |
Median | 2.9% | 3.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.5% | 2.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.2% | 3.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.61% | 1.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.54% | 2.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.53% | 2.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Fiji and Japanese by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Fiji are Immigrants from Australia (2.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Albanian (2.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Japan (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Central America (3.0%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Cambodia (3.0%, a difference of 0.25%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Immigrants from Philippines (3.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Panamanian (3.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Romania (3.0%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Moldova (3.0%, a difference of 0.28%), and Indonesian (3.0%, a difference of 0.38%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Australia | 67.4 /100 | #159 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 67.1 /100 | #160 | Good 2.9% |
Albanians | 66.6 /100 | #161 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Japan | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Central America | 64.9 /100 | #163 | Good 3.0% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 64.8 /100 | #164 | Good 3.0% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 64.2 /100 | #165 | Good 3.0% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 62.9 /100 | #166 | Good 3.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 58.1 /100 | #167 | Average 3.0% |
Immigrants | Greece | 57.9 /100 | #168 | Average 3.0% |
Arabs | 57.6 /100 | #169 | Average 3.0% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 56.9 /100 | #170 | Average 3.0% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 56.6 /100 | #171 | Average 3.0% |
Armenians | 56.0 /100 | #172 | Average 3.0% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 51.1 /100 | #173 | Average 3.0% |
Indonesians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 3.0% |
Immigrants | Romania | 48.4 /100 | #175 | Average 3.0% |
Panamanians | 47.0 /100 | #176 | Average 3.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 46.4 /100 | #177 | Average 3.0% |
Japanese | 46.0 /100 | #178 | Average 3.0% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 43.1 /100 | #179 | Average 3.0% |