Immigrants from Cambodia vs Japanese Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Cambodia
Japanese
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Cambodia
Japanese
3.0%
HEARING DISABILITY
64.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
164th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.0%
HEARING DISABILITY
46.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
178th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Cambodia vs Japanese Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,141,763 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cambodia and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.576 and weighted average of 3.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,105,269 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.363 and weighted average of 3.0%, a difference of 1.8%.

Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Cambodia | Japanese |
Minimum | 1.4% | 0.75% |
Maximum | 15.8% | 11.9% |
Range | 14.4% | 11.1% |
Mean | 4.9% | 3.9% |
Median | 3.2% | 3.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.9% | 2.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.1% | 3.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.2% | 1.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.5% | 2.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 2.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Cambodia and Japanese by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Cambodia are Immigrants from Central America (3.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (3.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Japan (2.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Albanian (2.9%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (3.0%, a difference of 0.20%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Immigrants from Philippines (3.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Panamanian (3.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Romania (3.0%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Moldova (3.0%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Sweden (3.0%, a difference of 0.34%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Albanians | 66.6 /100 | #161 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Japan | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Central America | 64.9 /100 | #163 | Good 3.0% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 64.8 /100 | #164 | Good 3.0% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 64.2 /100 | #165 | Good 3.0% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 62.9 /100 | #166 | Good 3.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 58.1 /100 | #167 | Average 3.0% |
Immigrants | Greece | 57.9 /100 | #168 | Average 3.0% |
Arabs | 57.6 /100 | #169 | Average 3.0% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 56.9 /100 | #170 | Average 3.0% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 56.6 /100 | #171 | Average 3.0% |
Armenians | 56.0 /100 | #172 | Average 3.0% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 51.1 /100 | #173 | Average 3.0% |
Indonesians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 3.0% |
Immigrants | Romania | 48.4 /100 | #175 | Average 3.0% |
Panamanians | 47.0 /100 | #176 | Average 3.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 46.4 /100 | #177 | Average 3.0% |
Japanese | 46.0 /100 | #178 | Average 3.0% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 43.1 /100 | #179 | Average 3.0% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 42.4 /100 | #180 | Average 3.0% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 41.5 /100 | #181 | Average 3.0% |