Icelander vs Immigrants from Sudan Female Disability
COMPARE
Icelander
Immigrants from Sudan
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Icelanders
Immigrants from Sudan
12.0%
FEMALE DISABILITY
80.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
151st/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.9%
FEMALE DISABILITY
89.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Icelander vs Immigrants from Sudan Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,642,732 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.139 and weighted average of 12.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,956,198 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sudan and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.018 and weighted average of 11.9%, a difference of 0.70%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Icelander | Immigrants from Sudan |
| Minimum | 2.2% | 1.7% |
| Maximum | 29.5% | 25.7% |
| Range | 27.3% | 24.0% |
| Mean | 12.8% | 11.9% |
| Median | 12.0% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.6% | 9.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.4% | 13.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.8% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.7% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.6% | 4.7% |
Demographics Similar to Icelanders and Immigrants from Sudan by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Immigrants from Moldova (12.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Greek (12.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Scotland (12.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Sudanese (12.0%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Kenya (12.0%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sudan are Immigrants from Africa (11.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Austria (12.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Estonian (12.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Ecuador (11.9%, a difference of 0.21%), and Romanian (11.9%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Immigrants | Norway | 93.8 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Ecuadorians | 93.4 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 92.8 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Romanians | 91.6 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 91.5 /100 | #141 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 90.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 89.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 87.9 /100 | #144 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Estonians | 87.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Pakistanis | 84.6 /100 | #146 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Nigerians | 84.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 83.1 /100 | #148 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Greeks | 82.0 /100 | #149 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 81.4 /100 | #150 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Icelanders | 80.7 /100 | #151 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 79.3 /100 | #152 | Good 12.0% |
| Sudanese | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 12.0% |
| Syrians | 76.9 /100 | #154 | Good 12.1% |
| Ghanaians | 76.6 /100 | #155 | Good 12.1% |
| Moroccans | 72.9 /100 | #156 | Good 12.1% |
| Danes | 72.5 /100 | #157 | Good 12.1% |