Tsimshian vs Tohono O'odham Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Tsimshian
Tohono O'odham
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Tsimshian
Tohono O'odham
8.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
344th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tsimshian vs Tohono O'odham Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,626,544 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.395 and weighted average of 8.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,714,537 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.617 and weighted average of 8.7%, a difference of 0.97%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Tsimshian | Tohono O'odham |
| Minimum | 4.1% | 0.26% |
| Maximum | 25.7% | 37.8% |
| Range | 21.5% | 37.5% |
| Mean | 10.2% | 12.1% |
| Median | 8.6% | 12.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.5% | 7.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.1% | 14.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.6% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.4% | 7.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 6.9% |
Demographics Similar to Tsimshian and Tohono O'odham by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Puerto Rican (8.9%, a difference of 0.59%), Kiowa (8.6%, a difference of 2.5%), Creek (8.5%, a difference of 4.4%), Houma (9.3%, a difference of 5.5%), and Choctaw (8.3%, a difference of 6.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tohono O'odham are Kiowa (8.6%, a difference of 1.5%), Puerto Rican (8.9%, a difference of 1.6%), Creek (8.5%, a difference of 3.4%), Choctaw (8.3%, a difference of 5.1%), and Pima (8.2%, a difference of 5.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 7.6% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 7.6% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 7.7% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 7.8% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 7.8% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.5% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.6% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 8.7% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 8.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 8.9% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 9.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 9.5% |