Finnish vs Immigrants from Western Africa Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Finnish
Immigrants from Western Africa
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Finns
Immigrants from Western Africa
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
17.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
206th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
33.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
190th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Finnish vs Immigrants from Western Africa Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 404,562,886 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Finns and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.262 and weighted average of 6.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 357,681,039 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Africa and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.477 and weighted average of 6.2%, a difference of 1.1%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Finnish | Immigrants from Western Africa |
Minimum | 0.58% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 27.6% | 19.4% |
Range | 27.1% | 17.2% |
Mean | 8.0% | 6.8% |
Median | 7.2% | 6.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.7% | 5.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.6% | 7.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 1.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.0% | 2.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.0% | 2.6% |
Demographics Similar to Finns and Immigrants from Western Africa by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Finns are Slovene (6.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Congo (6.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Ukraine (6.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Alsatian (6.3%, a difference of 0.21%), and Albanian (6.2%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Western Africa are Ukrainian (6.2%, a difference of 0.040%), British (6.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Guatemala (6.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Western Europe (6.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and Guatemalan (6.2%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
British | 34.3 /100 | #188 | Fair 6.2% |
Ukrainians | 34.0 /100 | #189 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 33.4 /100 | #190 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 31.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 31.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 6.2% |
Guatemalans | 30.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 6.2% |
Alaska Natives | 29.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 6.2% |
Belgians | 28.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 6.2% |
Malaysians | 28.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 6.2% |
Poles | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 24.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 6.2% |
Italians | 22.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Central America | 20.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 6.2% |
Albanians | 19.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 6.2% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 18.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 6.2% |
Immigrants | Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 6.2% |
Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 6.2% |
Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |
Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% |
Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |