Finnish vs Immigrants from Guatemala Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Finnish
Immigrants from Guatemala
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Finns
Immigrants from Guatemala
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
17.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
206th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
31.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
191st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Finnish vs Immigrants from Guatemala Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 404,562,886 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Finns and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.262 and weighted average of 6.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 377,192,086 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guatemala and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.165 and weighted average of 6.2%, a difference of 1.1%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Finnish | Immigrants from Guatemala |
| Minimum | 0.58% | 0.59% |
| Maximum | 27.6% | 13.5% |
| Range | 27.1% | 13.0% |
| Mean | 8.0% | 6.2% |
| Median | 7.2% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.7% | 4.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.6% | 7.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 2.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.0% | 2.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.0% | 2.5% |
Demographics Similar to Finns and Immigrants from Guatemala by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Finns are Slovene (6.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Congo (6.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Ukraine (6.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Alsatian (6.3%, a difference of 0.21%), and Albanian (6.2%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Guatemala are Immigrants from Western Europe (6.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Western Africa (6.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Ukrainian (6.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Guatemalan (6.2%, a difference of 0.12%), and Alaska Native (6.2%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| British | 34.3 /100 | #188 | Fair 6.2% |
| Ukrainians | 34.0 /100 | #189 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 33.4 /100 | #190 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 31.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 31.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 6.2% |
| Guatemalans | 30.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 6.2% |
| Alaska Natives | 29.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 6.2% |
| Belgians | 28.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 6.2% |
| Malaysians | 28.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 6.2% |
| Poles | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 24.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 6.2% |
| Italians | 22.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 20.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 6.2% |
| Albanians | 19.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 18.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 6.2% |
| Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 6.2% |
| Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |
| Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% |
| Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |