Ethiopian vs Asian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Ethiopian
 Asian
 Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Ethiopians
Asians
5.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
20th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
27th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ethiopian vs Asian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,167,947 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.250 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 550,442,799 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Asians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.181 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 0.78%.
 
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ethiopian | Asian | 
| Minimum | 0.17% | 1.8% | 
| Maximum | 9.8% | 9.5% | 
| Range | 9.6% | 7.7% | 
| Mean | 4.9% | 5.1% | 
| Median | 4.9% | 5.0% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.2% | 4.4% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.6% | 5.6% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.4% | 1.2% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.5% | 1.2% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 1.2% | 
Demographics Similar to Ethiopians and Asians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Immigrants from Kuwait (5.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Indian (Asian) (5.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (5.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.4%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Israel (5.4%, a difference of 0.37%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Asians are Cambodian (5.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Nepal (5.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Iran (5.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Zimbabwean (5.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (5.4%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability | 
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 5.3% | 
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 5.3% | 
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 5.3% | 
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 5.3% | 
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.4% | 
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% | 
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% | 
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% | 
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 5.4% | 
| Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 5.4% | 
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 5.4% | 
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 5.4% | 
| Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 5.4% | 
| Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 5.4% | 
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 5.4% | 
| Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 5.4% | 
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 5.4% | 
| Immigrants | Turkey | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 5.4% | 
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 5.4% | 
| Immigrants | Australia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 5.5% | 
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 5.5% |