Ethiopian vs Immigrants from Bolivia Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Ethiopian
Immigrants from Bolivia
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Ethiopians
Immigrants from Bolivia
5.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
20th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
6th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ethiopian vs Immigrants from Bolivia Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,167,947 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.250 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 158,713,852 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bolivia and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.140 and weighted average of 5.0%, a difference of 6.4%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ethiopian | Immigrants from Bolivia |
| Minimum | 0.17% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 9.8% | 9.9% |
| Range | 9.6% | 8.8% |
| Mean | 4.9% | 4.8% |
| Median | 4.9% | 4.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.2% | 3.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.6% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.4% | 1.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.5% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 1.5% |
Demographics Similar to Ethiopians and Immigrants from Bolivia by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Immigrants from Kuwait (5.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Indian (Asian) (5.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (5.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.4%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Israel (5.4%, a difference of 0.37%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bolivia are Bolivian (5.1%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants from Singapore (5.0%, a difference of 0.68%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (5.1%, a difference of 1.4%), Iranian (5.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and Immigrants from Taiwan (4.9%, a difference of 2.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Yup'ik | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 5.4% |