Egyptian vs Asian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Egyptian
Asian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Egyptians
Asians
5.6%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
27th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Egyptian vs Asian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 276,859,552 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Egyptians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.251 and weighted average of 5.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 550,442,799 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Asians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.181 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 2.8%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Egyptian | Asian |
| Minimum | 2.9% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 9.5% | 9.5% |
| Range | 6.6% | 7.7% |
| Mean | 5.4% | 5.1% |
| Median | 5.3% | 5.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 4.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.8% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 1.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.5% | 1.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 1.2% |
Demographics Similar to Egyptians and Asians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Egyptians are Immigrants from Sweden (5.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Indonesia (5.5%, a difference of 0.18%), Paraguayan (5.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Argentinean (5.5%, a difference of 0.83%), and Mongolian (5.5%, a difference of 0.91%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Asians are Cambodian (5.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Nepal (5.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Iran (5.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Turkey (5.4%, a difference of 0.77%), and Immigrants from Venezuela (5.4%, a difference of 0.79%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Turks | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Cypriots | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Venezuelans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Mongolians | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Argentineans | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Paraguayans | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Egyptians | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 5.6% |