Ecuadorian vs Moroccan Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Ecuadorian
Moroccan
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Ecuadorians
Moroccans
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
60.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
168th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
52.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
171st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ecuadorian vs Moroccan Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,738,990 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.221 and weighted average of 6.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 201,789,132 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Moroccans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.180 and weighted average of 6.1%, a difference of 0.43%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ecuadorian | Moroccan |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 2.5% |
| Maximum | 10.7% | 15.0% |
| Range | 8.8% | 12.5% |
| Mean | 5.6% | 6.9% |
| Median | 5.7% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.8% | 5.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.3% | 7.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.6% | 2.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.5% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 2.8% |
Demographics Similar to Ecuadorians and Moroccans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Immigrants from Oceania (6.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Iraqi (6.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (6.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Nicaraguan (6.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and Basque (6.1%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Moroccans are Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (6.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Ecuador (6.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Croatian (6.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Canada (6.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Southern Europe (6.1%, a difference of 0.29%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 71.1 /100 | #159 | Good 6.0% |
| Central Americans | 69.8 /100 | #160 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 69.2 /100 | #161 | Good 6.1% |
| Nigerians | 67.1 /100 | #162 | Good 6.1% |
| Lebanese | 66.2 /100 | #163 | Good 6.1% |
| Basques | 63.7 /100 | #164 | Good 6.1% |
| Nicaraguans | 63.2 /100 | #165 | Good 6.1% |
| Iraqis | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 60.7 /100 | #167 | Good 6.1% |
| Ecuadorians | 60.5 /100 | #168 | Good 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 58.1 /100 | #169 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 53.8 /100 | #170 | Average 6.1% |
| Moroccans | 52.6 /100 | #171 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 52.2 /100 | #172 | Average 6.1% |
| Croatians | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 6.1% |
| Vietnamese | 47.2 /100 | #175 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | North America | 45.6 /100 | #176 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | England | 45.4 /100 | #177 | Average 6.1% |
| Scandinavians | 44.5 /100 | #178 | Average 6.1% |
| Austrians | 44.1 /100 | #179 | Average 6.1% |