Dutch vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Vision Disability
COMPARE
Dutch
Trinidadian and Tobagonian
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Dutch
Trinidadians and Tobagonians
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
17.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
203rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
8.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
214th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Dutch vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 552,767,412 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Dutch and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.108 and weighted average of 2.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 219,745,653 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Trinidadians and Tobagonians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.346 and weighted average of 2.2%, a difference of 1.3%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Dutch | Trinidadian and Tobagonian |
| Minimum | 0.42% | 0.49% |
| Maximum | 19.4% | 4.1% |
| Range | 19.0% | 3.6% |
| Mean | 2.4% | 2.1% |
| Median | 2.0% | 2.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.2% | 1.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.4% | 2.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 0.92% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.9% | 0.75% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.9% | 0.74% |
Demographics Similar to Dutch and Trinidadians and Tobagonians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Dutch are Immigrants from Zaire (2.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Guyana (2.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Samoan (2.2%, a difference of 0.16%), Slovak (2.2%, a difference of 0.18%), and Pennsylvania German (2.2%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians are Immigrants from Ghana (2.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Bermudan (2.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Nigerian (2.3%, a difference of 0.21%), Indonesian (2.2%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (2.3%, a difference of 0.50%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Czechoslovakians | 21.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 21.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 20.1 /100 | #200 | Fair 2.2% |
| Slovaks | 18.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 18.0 /100 | #202 | Poor 2.2% |
| Dutch | 17.1 /100 | #203 | Poor 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 15.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 2.2% |
| Samoans | 15.7 /100 | #205 | Poor 2.2% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 14.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 13.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 2.2% |
| Germans | 13.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 13.1 /100 | #209 | Poor 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 11.5 /100 | #210 | Poor 2.2% |
| Indonesians | 9.5 /100 | #211 | Tragic 2.2% |
| Bermudans | 9.0 /100 | #212 | Tragic 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 8.9 /100 | #213 | Tragic 2.2% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 8.2 /100 | #214 | Tragic 2.2% |
| Nigerians | 7.2 /100 | #215 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 6.1 /100 | #216 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Barbadians | 5.1 /100 | #217 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Portuguese | 4.9 /100 | #218 | Tragic 2.3% |