Dutch vs Indonesian Vision Disability
COMPARE
Dutch
 Indonesian
 Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Dutch
Indonesians
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
17.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
203rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
9.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
211th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Dutch vs Indonesian Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 552,767,412 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Dutch and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.108 and weighted average of 2.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 162,708,643 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Indonesians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.137 and weighted average of 2.2%, a difference of 1.0%.
 
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Dutch | Indonesian | 
| Minimum | 0.42% | 0.34% | 
| Maximum | 19.4% | 4.0% | 
| Range | 19.0% | 3.7% | 
| Mean | 2.4% | 2.1% | 
| Median | 2.0% | 2.1% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.2% | 1.7% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.4% | 2.4% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 0.71% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.9% | 0.74% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.9% | 0.73% | 
Demographics Similar to Dutch and Indonesians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Dutch are Immigrants from Zaire (2.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Guyana (2.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Samoan (2.2%, a difference of 0.16%), Slovak (2.2%, a difference of 0.18%), and Pennsylvania German (2.2%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Indonesians are Bermudan (2.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Ghana (2.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (2.2%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Uruguay (2.2%, a difference of 0.34%), and Nigerian (2.3%, a difference of 0.44%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability | 
| Ghanaians | 21.8 /100 | #197  | Fair 2.2%  | 
| Czechoslovakians | 21.6 /100 | #198  | Fair 2.2%  | 
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 21.0 /100 | #199  | Fair 2.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Thailand | 20.1 /100 | #200  | Fair 2.2%  | 
| Slovaks | 18.8 /100 | #201  | Poor 2.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Zaire | 18.0 /100 | #202  | Poor 2.2%  | 
| Dutch | 17.1 /100 | #203  | Poor 2.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Guyana | 15.9 /100 | #204  | Poor 2.2%  | 
| Samoans | 15.7 /100 | #205  | Poor 2.2%  | 
| Pennsylvania Germans | 14.5 /100 | #206  | Poor 2.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 13.5 /100 | #207  | Poor 2.2%  | 
| Germans | 13.4 /100 | #208  | Poor 2.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Brazil | 13.1 /100 | #209  | Poor 2.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 11.5 /100 | #210  | Poor 2.2%  | 
| Indonesians | 9.5 /100 | #211  | Tragic 2.2%  | 
| Bermudans | 9.0 /100 | #212  | Tragic 2.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Ghana | 8.9 /100 | #213  | Tragic 2.2%  | 
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 8.2 /100 | #214  | Tragic 2.2%  | 
| Nigerians | 7.2 /100 | #215  | Tragic 2.3%  | 
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 6.1 /100 | #216  | Tragic 2.3%  | 
| Barbadians | 5.1 /100 | #217  | Tragic 2.3%  |