Czech vs Immigrants from Hungary Vision Disability
COMPARE
Czech
Immigrants from Hungary
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Czechs
Immigrants from Hungary
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
86.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
136th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
88.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
131st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czech vs Immigrants from Hungary Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 483,953,128 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.160 and weighted average of 2.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,649,550 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hungary and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.095 and weighted average of 2.1%, a difference of 0.35%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czech | Immigrants from Hungary |
| Minimum | 0.36% | 0.26% |
| Maximum | 10.1% | 3.7% |
| Range | 9.8% | 3.5% |
| Mean | 2.8% | 1.9% |
| Median | 2.4% | 2.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.9% | 1.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.3% | 2.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.4% | 0.87% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.5% | 0.76% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 0.75% |
Demographics Similar to Czechs and Immigrants from Hungary by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (2.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Arab (2.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Vietnamese (2.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Venezuelan (2.1%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Morocco (2.1%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hungary are Immigrants from Kenya (2.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Cameroon (2.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Chile (2.1%, a difference of 0.050%), New Zealander (2.1%, a difference of 0.080%), and Sudanese (2.1%, a difference of 0.090%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Immigrants | Albania | 90.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 89.8 /100 | #124 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 89.8 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 89.5 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Sudanese | 89.2 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 89.0 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 88.8 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 88.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 88.7 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.1% |
| New Zealanders | 88.2 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Syrians | 87.5 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Venezuelans | 87.2 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Vietnamese | 86.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Czechs | 86.3 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 86.3 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Arabs | 86.3 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 85.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 84.2 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 84.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.1% |
| South Americans | 82.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 82.8 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.1% |