Czech vs Ukrainian Vision Disability
COMPARE
Czech
Ukrainian
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Czechs
Ukrainians
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
86.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
136th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
81.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
144th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czech vs Ukrainian Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 483,953,128 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.160 and weighted average of 2.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 448,040,924 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Ukrainians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.612 and weighted average of 2.1%, a difference of 0.54%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czech | Ukrainian |
| Minimum | 0.36% | 0.95% |
| Maximum | 10.1% | 11.5% |
| Range | 9.8% | 10.5% |
| Mean | 2.8% | 3.2% |
| Median | 2.4% | 2.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.9% | 1.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.3% | 3.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.4% | 1.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.5% | 2.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 2.6% |
Demographics Similar to Czechs and Ukrainians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (2.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Arab (2.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Vietnamese (2.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Venezuelan (2.1%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Morocco (2.1%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ukrainians are Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (2.1%, a difference of 0.040%), South American (2.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (2.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Italian (2.1%, a difference of 0.23%), and Sierra Leonean (2.1%, a difference of 0.25%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 88.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 88.7 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.1% |
| New Zealanders | 88.2 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Syrians | 87.5 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Venezuelans | 87.2 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Vietnamese | 86.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Czechs | 86.3 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 86.3 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Arabs | 86.3 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 85.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 84.2 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 84.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.1% |
| South Americans | 82.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 82.8 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Ukrainians | 81.9 /100 | #144 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 81.5 /100 | #145 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Italians | 79.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 78.4 /100 | #147 | Good 2.1% |
| Finns | 78.3 /100 | #148 | Good 2.1% |
| Colombians | 76.2 /100 | #149 | Good 2.1% |
| Belgians | 75.9 /100 | #150 | Good 2.1% |