Czech vs Chinese Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Czech
Chinese
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Czechs
Chinese
3.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
271st/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
289th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czech vs Chinese Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 484,559,350 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.203 and weighted average of 3.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,801,631 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.314 and weighted average of 3.7%, a difference of 4.5%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czech | Chinese |
| Minimum | 0.98% | 0.63% |
| Maximum | 13.6% | 11.0% |
| Range | 12.6% | 10.4% |
| Mean | 4.9% | 4.4% |
| Median | 4.3% | 3.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.6% | 3.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.3% | 4.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 1.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.3% | 2.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.3% | 2.2% |
Demographics Similar to Czechs and Chinese by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are European (3.5%, a difference of 0.26%), Fijian (3.5%, a difference of 0.26%), Puerto Rican (3.5%, a difference of 0.33%), Swiss (3.5%, a difference of 0.66%), and Czechoslovakian (3.6%, a difference of 0.86%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are White/Caucasian (3.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Irish (3.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Spanish (3.7%, a difference of 0.78%), Delaware (3.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and Sioux (3.6%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Europeans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Czechs | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Swiss | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Czechoslovakians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Danes | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Basques | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Slovaks | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 3.6% |
| French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Scandinavians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Swedes | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Spanish | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Irish | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Chinese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 3.7% |