Lebanese vs Chinese Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Lebanese
Chinese
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Lebanese
Chinese
3.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
5.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
226th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
289th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lebanese vs Chinese Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 401,493,679 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Lebanese and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.476 and weighted average of 3.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,801,631 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.314 and weighted average of 3.7%, a difference of 14.9%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Lebanese | Chinese |
| Minimum | 0.31% | 0.63% |
| Maximum | 17.8% | 11.0% |
| Range | 17.4% | 10.4% |
| Mean | 5.0% | 4.4% |
| Median | 3.5% | 3.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.1% | 3.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.9% | 4.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.8% | 1.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.9% | 2.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 2.2% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Lebanese by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Lebanese are Latvian (3.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Icelander (3.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Bhutanese (3.2%, a difference of 0.18%), Mexican (3.2%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Portugal (3.2%, a difference of 0.38%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| New Zealanders | 6.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Malaysians | 6.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 6.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 6.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Mexicans | 5.6 /100 | #223 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Icelanders | 5.2 /100 | #224 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Latvians | 5.1 /100 | #225 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Lebanese | 5.0 /100 | #226 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Bhutanese | 4.6 /100 | #227 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 4.3 /100 | #228 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Maltese | 4.1 /100 | #229 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Greeks | 3.2 /100 | #230 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Luxembourgers | 2.9 /100 | #231 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Ukrainians | 2.9 /100 | #232 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Estonians | 2.4 /100 | #233 | Tragic 3.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are White/Caucasian (3.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Finnish (3.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Irish (3.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Native Hawaiian (3.7%, a difference of 0.21%), and Norwegian (3.7%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Swedes | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Spanish | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Irish | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Chinese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Finns | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Native Hawaiians | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Norwegians | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Welsh | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 3.7% |