Czech vs Chinese Unemployment Among Ages 30 to 34 years
COMPARE
Czech
Chinese
Unemployment Among Ages 30 to 34 years
Unemployment Among Ages 30 to 34 years Comparison
Czechs
Chinese
5.0%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 30 TO 34 YEARS
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
36th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 30 TO 34 YEARS
97.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
55th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czech vs Chinese Unemployment Among Ages 30 to 34 years Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 438,540,719 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and unemployment rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.240 and weighted average of 5.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,021,968 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and unemployment rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.496 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 2.0%.
Unemployment Among Ages 30 to 34 years Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czech | Chinese |
| Minimum | 0.50% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 51.6% | 22.6% |
| Range | 51.1% | 21.1% |
| Mean | 9.5% | 6.0% |
| Median | 5.6% | 5.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.2% | 3.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.0% | 7.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.7% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.8% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.7% | 3.8% |
Demographics Similar to Czechs and Chinese by Unemployment Among Ages 30 to 34 years
In terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Turkey (5.0%, a difference of 0.25%), Sri Lankan (5.0%, a difference of 0.25%), Fijian (5.0%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Vietnam (5.0%, a difference of 0.44%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Morocco (5.1%, a difference of 0.20%), Cuban (5.1%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (5.1%, a difference of 0.43%), Turkish (5.1%, a difference of 0.47%), and Puget Sound Salish (5.1%, a difference of 0.50%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Ages 30 to 34 years |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 99.2 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Czechs | 99.2 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 99.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Sri Lankans | 99.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Fijians | 99.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 98.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 98.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 98.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Soviet Union | 98.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 98.7 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Yugoslavians | 98.6 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 98.4 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Cypriots | 98.4 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 98.4 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 98.3 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 98.2 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Turks | 98.2 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 98.1 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Cubans | 98.1 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 97.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Chinese | 97.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 5.1% |