Czech vs Blackfeet Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Czech
Blackfeet
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Czechs
Blackfeet
3.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
271st/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.6%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
283rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czech vs Blackfeet Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 484,559,350 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.203 and weighted average of 3.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 309,445,553 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Blackfeet and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.013 and weighted average of 3.6%, a difference of 2.8%.

Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Czech | Blackfeet |
Minimum | 0.98% | 0.91% |
Maximum | 13.6% | 25.6% |
Range | 12.6% | 24.7% |
Mean | 4.9% | 7.4% |
Median | 4.3% | 6.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.6% | 4.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.3% | 8.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 4.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.3% | 4.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.3% | 4.5% |
Demographics Similar to Czechs and Blackfeet by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are European (3.5%, a difference of 0.26%), Fijian (3.5%, a difference of 0.26%), Puerto Rican (3.5%, a difference of 0.33%), Ute (3.5%, a difference of 0.61%), and Swiss (3.5%, a difference of 0.66%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Blackfeet are Swedish (3.6%, a difference of 0.25%), Scandinavian (3.6%, a difference of 0.34%), French American Indian (3.6%, a difference of 0.40%), Slovak (3.6%, a difference of 0.46%), and Immigrants from Micronesia (3.6%, a difference of 0.47%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Canadians | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 3.5% |
Spaniards | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 3.5% |
Ute | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 3.5% |
Europeans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 3.5% |
Czechs | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 3.5% |
Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 3.5% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 3.5% |
Swiss | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 3.5% |
Czechoslovakians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 3.6% |
Danes | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 3.6% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 3.6% |
Basques | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 3.6% |
Slovaks | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 3.6% |
French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 3.6% |
Scandinavians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 3.6% |
Swedes | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 3.6% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 3.6% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 3.6% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 3.6% |
Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 3.6% |
Spanish | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 3.7% |