Chippewa vs Immigrants from Oceania Female Disability
COMPARE
Chippewa
Immigrants from Oceania
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Chippewa
Immigrants from Oceania
14.0%
FEMALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
317th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.1%
FEMALE DISABILITY
61.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
165th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Oceania Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,042,988 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.176 and weighted average of 14.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,480,731 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.114 and weighted average of 12.1%, a difference of 15.3%.
![Chippewa vs Immigrants from Oceania Female Disability](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/female-disability/chippewa-vs-immigrants-from-oceania-female-disability-chart.webp)
Female Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chippewa | Immigrants from Oceania |
Minimum | 1.9% | 2.2% |
Maximum | 40.4% | 48.6% |
Range | 38.5% | 46.4% |
Mean | 16.9% | 15.8% |
Median | 15.4% | 13.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.1% | 11.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.3% | 16.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 4.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.2% | 9.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.2% | 8.8% |
Similar Demographics by Female Disability
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Spanish American (14.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Paiute (14.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Iroquois (14.0%, a difference of 0.40%), Alaskan Athabascan (13.9%, a difference of 0.47%), and American (14.1%, a difference of 0.74%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 13.7% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 13.7% |
Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 13.8% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 13.8% |
Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 13.8% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 13.9% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 14.0% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 14.0% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 14.0% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 14.0% |
Americans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 14.1% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 14.1% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 14.1% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 14.1% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 14.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Czech (12.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Guatemalan (12.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Lithuanian (12.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Ukraine (12.1%, a difference of 0.10%), and Guyanese (12.1%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 72.4 /100 | #158 | Good 12.1% |
Immigrants | Central America | 67.7 /100 | #159 | Good 12.1% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 66.0 /100 | #160 | Good 12.1% |
Guyanese | 64.7 /100 | #161 | Good 12.1% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 64.3 /100 | #162 | Good 12.1% |
Guatemalans | 63.8 /100 | #163 | Good 12.1% |
Czechs | 63.6 /100 | #164 | Good 12.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 61.8 /100 | #165 | Good 12.1% |
Lithuanians | 59.5 /100 | #166 | Average 12.2% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 59.0 /100 | #167 | Average 12.2% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 58.8 /100 | #168 | Average 12.2% |
Lebanese | 58.1 /100 | #169 | Average 12.2% |
Maltese | 57.0 /100 | #170 | Average 12.2% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 56.3 /100 | #171 | Average 12.2% |
Haitians | 51.9 /100 | #172 | Average 12.2% |