Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Oceania Female Disability
COMPARE
Alaskan Athabascan
Immigrants from Oceania
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Alaskan Athabascans
Immigrants from Oceania
13.9%
FEMALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.1%
FEMALE DISABILITY
61.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
165th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Oceania Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,817,882 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.220 and weighted average of 13.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,480,731 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.114 and weighted average of 12.1%, a difference of 14.7%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Alaskan Athabascan | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Minimum | 2.6% | 2.2% |
| Maximum | 40.4% | 48.6% |
| Range | 37.8% | 46.4% |
| Mean | 16.7% | 15.8% |
| Median | 15.4% | 13.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.9% | 11.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.7% | 16.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.8% | 4.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.6% | 9.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.6% | 8.8% |
Similar Demographics by Female Disability
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Spanish American (14.0%, a difference of 0.36%), Chippewa (14.0%, a difference of 0.47%), Paiute (14.0%, a difference of 0.58%), Puget Sound Salish (13.8%, a difference of 0.59%), and Blackfeet (13.8%, a difference of 0.69%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 13.7% |
| French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 13.7% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 13.7% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 13.7% |
| Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 13.8% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 13.8% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 13.8% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 13.9% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 14.0% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 14.0% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 14.0% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 14.0% |
| Americans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 14.1% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 14.1% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 14.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Czech (12.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Guatemalan (12.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Lithuanian (12.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Ukraine (12.1%, a difference of 0.10%), and Guyanese (12.1%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 72.4 /100 | #158 | Good 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 67.7 /100 | #159 | Good 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 66.0 /100 | #160 | Good 12.1% |
| Guyanese | 64.7 /100 | #161 | Good 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 64.3 /100 | #162 | Good 12.1% |
| Guatemalans | 63.8 /100 | #163 | Good 12.1% |
| Czechs | 63.6 /100 | #164 | Good 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 61.8 /100 | #165 | Good 12.1% |
| Lithuanians | 59.5 /100 | #166 | Average 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 59.0 /100 | #167 | Average 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 58.8 /100 | #168 | Average 12.2% |
| Lebanese | 58.1 /100 | #169 | Average 12.2% |
| Maltese | 57.0 /100 | #170 | Average 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 56.3 /100 | #171 | Average 12.2% |
| Haitians | 51.9 /100 | #172 | Average 12.2% |