Inupiat vs Immigrants from Oceania Female Disability
COMPARE
Inupiat
Immigrants from Oceania
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Inupiat
Immigrants from Oceania
11.3%
FEMALE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
50th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.1%
FEMALE DISABILITY
61.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
165th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Inupiat vs Immigrants from Oceania Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,332,490 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Inupiat and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.470 and weighted average of 11.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,480,731 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.114 and weighted average of 12.1%, a difference of 7.4%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Inupiat | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Minimum | 3.4% | 2.2% |
| Maximum | 30.3% | 48.6% |
| Range | 26.9% | 46.4% |
| Mean | 11.8% | 15.8% |
| Median | 10.7% | 13.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.5% | 11.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.3% | 16.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 4.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.9% | 9.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.8% | 8.8% |
Similar Demographics by Female Disability
Demographics Similar to Inupiat by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Inupiat are Immigrants from Belgium (11.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Peru (11.3%, a difference of 0.20%), Tongan (11.3%, a difference of 0.23%), Jordanian (11.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and Zimbabwean (11.3%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 100.0 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Jordanians | 100.0 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Inupiat | 100.0 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 100.0 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 99.9 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 99.9 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Peruvians | 99.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Taiwanese | 99.9 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| South Americans | 99.9 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Czech (12.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Guatemalan (12.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Lithuanian (12.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Ukraine (12.1%, a difference of 0.10%), and Guyanese (12.1%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 72.4 /100 | #158 | Good 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 67.7 /100 | #159 | Good 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 66.0 /100 | #160 | Good 12.1% |
| Guyanese | 64.7 /100 | #161 | Good 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 64.3 /100 | #162 | Good 12.1% |
| Guatemalans | 63.8 /100 | #163 | Good 12.1% |
| Czechs | 63.6 /100 | #164 | Good 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 61.8 /100 | #165 | Good 12.1% |
| Lithuanians | 59.5 /100 | #166 | Average 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 59.0 /100 | #167 | Average 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 58.8 /100 | #168 | Average 12.2% |
| Lebanese | 58.1 /100 | #169 | Average 12.2% |
| Maltese | 57.0 /100 | #170 | Average 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 56.3 /100 | #171 | Average 12.2% |
| Haitians | 51.9 /100 | #172 | Average 12.2% |