Chippewa vs Immigrants from Dominican Republic Female Disability
COMPARE
Chippewa
Immigrants from Dominican Republic
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Chippewa
Immigrants from Dominican Republic
14.0%
FEMALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
317th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.4%
FEMALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
299th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Dominican Republic Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,042,988 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.176 and weighted average of 14.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 275,087,890 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Dominican Republic and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.205 and weighted average of 13.4%, a difference of 4.4%.

Female Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chippewa | Immigrants from Dominican Republic |
Minimum | 1.9% | 7.0% |
Maximum | 40.4% | 23.4% |
Range | 38.5% | 16.4% |
Mean | 16.9% | 14.3% |
Median | 15.4% | 13.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.1% | 12.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.3% | 15.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 3.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.2% | 3.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.2% | 3.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa and Immigrants from Dominican Republic by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Spanish American (14.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Paiute (14.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Alaskan Athabascan (13.9%, a difference of 0.47%), Puget Sound Salish (13.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and Blackfeet (13.8%, a difference of 1.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Dominican Republic are Pennsylvania German (13.4%, a difference of 0.010%), African (13.4%, a difference of 0.21%), Nonimmigrants (13.4%, a difference of 0.26%), Scotch-Irish (13.4%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Portugal (13.5%, a difference of 0.35%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 13.4% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 13.4% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 13.4% |
Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 13.5% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 13.5% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 13.5% |
French Canadians | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 13.6% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 13.6% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 13.7% |
French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 13.7% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 13.7% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 13.7% |
Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 13.8% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 13.8% |
Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 13.8% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 13.9% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 14.0% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 14.0% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 14.0% |