Chippewa vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Households
COMPARE
Chippewa
 Immigrants from Oceania
 Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Chippewa
Immigrants from Oceania
62.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
308th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
94.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,001,181 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.447 and weighted average of 62.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,389,085 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.567 and weighted average of 64.9%, a difference of 4.5%.
 
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chippewa | Immigrants from Oceania | 
| Minimum | 25.0% | 8.8% | 
| Maximum | 100.0% | 91.4% | 
| Range | 75.0% | 82.6% | 
| Mean | 65.2% | 64.5% | 
| Median | 63.9% | 67.1% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 57.0% | 62.7% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 70.6% | 71.6% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.5% | 8.8% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.8% | 15.4% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.7% | 15.2% | 
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Immigrants from Norway (62.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Subsaharan African (62.1%, a difference of 0.050%), African (62.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Bermudan (62.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Liberia (62.0%, a difference of 0.10%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households | 
| Immigrants | Albania | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 62.4% | 
| Immigrants | Kenya | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 62.3% | 
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 62.3% | 
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 62.2% | 
| Bermudans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 62.2% | 
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 62.1% | 
| Immigrants | Norway | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 62.1% | 
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 62.1% | 
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 62.1% | 
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 62.0% | 
| Immigrants | Morocco | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 62.0% | 
| Immigrants | Latvia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 62.0% | 
| Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 62.0% | 
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 61.9% | 
| Moroccans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 61.9% | 
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (64.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Hungarian (64.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Hmong (64.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Choctaw (64.9%, a difference of 0.050%), and Dutch (64.9%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households | 
| Spanish | 96.2 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 65.0% | 
| Argentineans | 95.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 65.0% | 
| Ecuadorians | 95.4 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 65.0% | 
| Immigrants | Iraq | 95.4 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 65.0% | 
| Cherokee | 95.3 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 65.0% | 
| Dutch | 95.1 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 64.9% | 
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 94.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 64.9% | 
| Immigrants | Oceania | 94.2 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 64.9% | 
| Hungarians | 94.0 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 64.9% | 
| Hmong | 93.4 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 64.9% | 
| Choctaw | 93.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 64.9% | 
| Immigrants | Argentina | 92.8 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 64.9% | 
| Immigrants | Belize | 92.7 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 64.9% | 
| Panamanians | 92.4 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 64.8% | 
| Immigrants | Panama | 92.0 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 64.8% |