Chinese vs Croatian Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Chinese
Croatian
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Chinese
Croatians
15.9%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
3rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.4%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
23rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Croatian Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,802,428 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.101 and weighted average of 15.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 375,711,663 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Croatians and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.145 and weighted average of 16.4%, a difference of 2.8%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese | Croatian |
| Minimum | 10.5% | 4.2% |
| Maximum | 30.0% | 38.2% |
| Range | 19.5% | 34.0% |
| Mean | 16.3% | 15.8% |
| Median | 16.1% | 15.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.9% | 13.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.3% | 17.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.4% | 3.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 6.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and Croatians by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Lithuania (16.0%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (16.0%, a difference of 0.59%), Thai (16.1%, a difference of 1.2%), Immigrants from Ireland (16.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Poland (16.1%, a difference of 1.3%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Croatians are Immigrants from South Central Asia (16.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Cuba (16.3%, a difference of 0.16%), Bulgarian (16.3%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (16.3%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Bolivia (16.3%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.0% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 16.0% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 16.1% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 16.2% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 16.2% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 16.2% |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 16.2% |
| Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 16.3% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 16.3% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 16.3% |
| Eastern Europeans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 16.3% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 16.3% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 16.3% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 16.3% |
| Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 16.3% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 16.3% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Croatians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 16.4% |