Bulgarian vs Immigrants from Lithuania Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Bulgarian
Immigrants from Lithuania
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Bulgarians
Immigrants from Lithuania
3.0%
HEARING DISABILITY
39.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
183rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
73.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
152nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bulgarian vs Immigrants from Lithuania Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,610,417 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Bulgarians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.194 and weighted average of 3.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,714,489 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.157 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 3.4%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bulgarian | Immigrants from Lithuania |
| Minimum | 0.54% | 2.1% |
| Maximum | 8.7% | 5.7% |
| Range | 8.2% | 3.5% |
| Mean | 3.3% | 3.3% |
| Median | 3.1% | 3.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.5% | 2.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.7% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 0.78% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.4% | 0.86% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.4% | 0.85% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Bulgarians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Bulgarians are Immigrants from Italy (3.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Belgium (3.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Ireland (3.0%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Sweden (3.0%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Moldova (3.0%, a difference of 0.32%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Panamanians | 47.0 /100 | #176 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 46.4 /100 | #177 | Average 3.0% |
| Japanese | 46.0 /100 | #178 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 43.1 /100 | #179 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 42.4 /100 | #180 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 41.5 /100 | #181 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 41.1 /100 | #182 | Average 3.0% |
| Bulgarians | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 37.4 /100 | #184 | Fair 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 35.3 /100 | #185 | Fair 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 34.9 /100 | #186 | Fair 3.0% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 34.7 /100 | #187 | Fair 3.0% |
| Mexican American Indians | 34.7 /100 | #188 | Fair 3.0% |
| Africans | 32.9 /100 | #189 | Fair 3.0% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 31.1 /100 | #190 | Fair 3.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Lithuania by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lithuania are Immigrants from France (2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Palestinian (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Sudanese (2.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Lebanon (2.9%, a difference of 0.18%), and Costa Rican (2.9%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
| Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
| Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
| Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 71.5 /100 | #154 | Good 2.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.4 /100 | #155 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 70.2 /100 | #156 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 69.6 /100 | #157 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 69.5 /100 | #158 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 67.4 /100 | #159 | Good 2.9% |