Immigrants from North America vs Immigrants from Lithuania Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from North America
Immigrants from Lithuania
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from North America
Immigrants from Lithuania
3.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
262nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
73.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
152nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from North America vs Immigrants from Lithuania Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 462,279,927 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from North America and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.792 and weighted average of 3.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,714,489 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.157 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 18.4%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from North America | Immigrants from Lithuania |
| Minimum | 0.49% | 2.1% |
| Maximum | 60.0% | 5.7% |
| Range | 59.5% | 3.5% |
| Mean | 10.2% | 3.3% |
| Median | 7.0% | 3.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.5% | 2.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.0% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.6% | 0.78% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.5% | 0.86% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.3% | 0.85% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from North America by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from North America are Immigrants from Canada (3.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Hawaiian (3.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Portuguese (3.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Slovene (3.5%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Germany (3.5%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Poles | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Hmong | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Yaqui | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Northern Europeans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Slovenes | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Portuguese | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Hawaiians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Immigrants | North America | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 3.5% |
| British | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Belgians | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Canadians | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Spaniards | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Ute | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 3.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Lithuania by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lithuania are Immigrants from France (2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Palestinian (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Sudanese (2.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Lebanon (2.9%, a difference of 0.18%), and Costa Rican (2.9%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
| Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
| Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
| Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 71.5 /100 | #154 | Good 2.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.4 /100 | #155 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 70.2 /100 | #156 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 69.6 /100 | #157 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 69.5 /100 | #158 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 67.4 /100 | #159 | Good 2.9% |