British vs Swiss No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
British
Swiss
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
British
Swiss
7.6%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
27th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
42nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
British vs Swiss No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 528,049,414 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of British and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.837 and weighted average of 7.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 462,788,069 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.537 and weighted average of 7.9%, a difference of 3.5%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | British | Swiss |
| Minimum | 1.0% | 2.8% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 65.0% |
| Range | 99.0% | 62.2% |
| Mean | 10.8% | 14.0% |
| Median | 6.0% | 9.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.5% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.9% | 15.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.4% | 9.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.1% | 13.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.0% | 13.1% |
Demographics Similar to British and Swiss by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to British are Sri Lankan (7.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Samoan (7.6%, a difference of 0.55%), American (7.7%, a difference of 0.84%), Finnish (7.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and Native Hawaiian (7.7%, a difference of 1.3%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Chickasaw (7.9%, a difference of 0.080%), French Canadian (7.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Czechoslovakian (7.8%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Fiji (7.8%, a difference of 0.38%), and Choctaw (7.9%, a difference of 0.44%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 7.5% |
| Yaqui | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 7.5% |
| Sri Lankans | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 7.6% |
| British | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 7.6% |
| Samoans | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 7.6% |
| Americans | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Finns | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Native Hawaiians | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Malaysians | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Cherokee | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Iraqis | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Basques | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Creek | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| French Canadians | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Swiss | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Chickasaw | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Choctaw | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 7.9% |