Black/African American vs Chinese Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Black/African American
Chinese
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Blacks/African Americans
Chinese
19.0%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
336th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
3rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Black/African American vs Chinese Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 565,879,881 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Blacks/African Americans and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.416 and weighted average of 19.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,802,428 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.101 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 19.5%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Black/African American | Chinese |
Minimum | 15.0% | 10.5% |
Maximum | 23.5% | 30.0% |
Range | 8.6% | 19.5% |
Mean | 19.3% | 16.3% |
Median | 19.1% | 16.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.3% | 13.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.3% | 17.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.0% | 3.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.5% | 3.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 3.4% |
Similar Demographics by Cognitive Disability
Demographics Similar to Blacks/African Americans by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Blacks/African Americans are Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (19.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Senegalese (19.0%, a difference of 0.29%), Lumbee (19.1%, a difference of 0.47%), Sudanese (18.9%, a difference of 0.84%), and Puerto Rican (19.2%, a difference of 0.95%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.8% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 18.8% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 18.8% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 18.8% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 18.8% |
Sudanese | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 18.9% |
Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 19.0% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 19.0% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 19.1% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 19.1% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 19.2% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 19.2% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 19.3% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 19.3% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 19.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from India (15.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Lithuania (16.0%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (16.0%, a difference of 0.59%), Thai (16.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and Immigrants from Ireland (16.1%, a difference of 1.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 15.7% |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 15.9% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 15.9% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.0% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 16.0% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 16.1% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 16.1% |
Immigrants | Poland | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 16.1% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 16.2% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 16.2% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 16.2% |
Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 16.2% |
Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 16.3% |
Immigrants | Austria | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 16.3% |
Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 16.3% |