Sudanese vs Chinese Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Sudanese
Chinese
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Sudanese
Chinese
18.9%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
334th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
3rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sudanese vs Chinese Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,121,585 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.083 and weighted average of 18.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,802,428 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.101 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 18.5%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Sudanese | Chinese |
| Minimum | 7.8% | 10.5% |
| Maximum | 27.0% | 30.0% |
| Range | 19.2% | 19.5% |
| Mean | 18.3% | 16.3% |
| Median | 18.4% | 16.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.1% | 13.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.7% | 17.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.5% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 3.4% |
Similar Demographics by Cognitive Disability
Demographics Similar to Sudanese by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Immigrants from Yemen (18.8%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants from Sudan (18.8%, a difference of 0.44%), Pima (18.8%, a difference of 0.45%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (18.8%, a difference of 0.52%), and Senegalese (19.0%, a difference of 0.54%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 18.7% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.7% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 18.8% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 18.8% |
| Sudanese | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 18.9% |
| Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 19.0% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 19.1% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 19.1% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 19.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from India (15.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Lithuania (16.0%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (16.0%, a difference of 0.59%), Thai (16.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and Immigrants from Ireland (16.1%, a difference of 1.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 15.7% |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 15.9% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.0% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 16.0% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 16.1% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 16.2% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 16.2% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 16.2% |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 16.2% |
| Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 16.3% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 16.3% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 16.3% |