Ugandan vs Chinese Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Ugandan
Chinese
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Ugandans
Chinese
18.3%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
307th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
3rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ugandan vs Chinese Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,018,576 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.320 and weighted average of 18.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,802,428 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.101 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 15.2%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ugandan | Chinese |
| Minimum | 6.9% | 10.5% |
| Maximum | 25.9% | 30.0% |
| Range | 18.9% | 19.5% |
| Mean | 16.4% | 16.3% |
| Median | 17.1% | 16.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.4% | 13.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.3% | 17.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 3.4% |
Similar Demographics by Cognitive Disability
Demographics Similar to Ugandans by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Seminole (18.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Colville (18.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Western Africa (18.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (18.4%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Eritrea (18.3%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Ugandans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Hmong | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 18.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from India (15.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Lithuania (16.0%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (16.0%, a difference of 0.59%), Thai (16.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and Immigrants from Ireland (16.1%, a difference of 1.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 15.7% |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 15.9% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.0% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 16.0% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 16.1% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 16.2% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 16.2% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 16.2% |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 16.2% |
| Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 16.3% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 16.3% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 16.3% |