Bhutanese vs Lithuanian Unemployment
COMPARE
Bhutanese
Lithuanian
Unemployment
Unemployment Comparison
Bhutanese
Lithuanians
4.9%
UNEMPLOYMENT
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
59th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.8%
UNEMPLOYMENT
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
39th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs Lithuanian Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,875,452 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.395 and weighted average of 4.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 421,273,270 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.335 and weighted average of 4.8%, a difference of 1.9%.
Unemployment Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bhutanese | Lithuanian |
Minimum | 0.60% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 9.9% | 15.9% |
Range | 9.3% | 14.4% |
Mean | 4.7% | 5.7% |
Median | 4.8% | 4.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.7% | 4.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.5% | 6.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.8% | 1.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.5% | 2.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 2.7% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese and Lithuanians by Unemployment
In terms of unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Greek (4.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Singapore (4.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Celtic (4.9%, a difference of 0.20%), Australian (4.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and Eastern European (4.9%, a difference of 0.39%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Northern European (4.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (4.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Filipino (4.8%, a difference of 0.52%), Yugoslavian (4.8%, a difference of 0.72%), and Austrian (4.8%, a difference of 0.78%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment |
Lithuanians | 99.7 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Northern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 99.7 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Filipinos | 99.5 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Yugoslavians | 99.5 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Austrians | 99.5 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.8% |
French | 99.5 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 99.4 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 99.4 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.3 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.3 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.9% |
French Canadians | 99.3 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 99.2 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Whites/Caucasians | 99.2 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.2 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Australians | 99.2 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Celtics | 99.1 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.1 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Greeks | 99.0 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Bhutanese | 99.0 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 4.9% |