Bhutanese vs Cambodian Vision Disability
COMPARE
Bhutanese
Cambodian
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Bhutanese
Cambodians
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
37th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
36th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs Cambodian Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,984,678 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.063 and weighted average of 2.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,480,500 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Cambodians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.440 and weighted average of 2.0%, a difference of 0.25%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bhutanese | Cambodian |
Minimum | 0.49% | 0.17% |
Maximum | 5.1% | 6.8% |
Range | 4.6% | 6.6% |
Mean | 2.0% | 2.1% |
Median | 1.8% | 1.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.5% | 1.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.2% | 2.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.74% | 0.90% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.77% | 1.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.76% | 1.5% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese and Cambodians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Kuwait (2.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Zimbabwean (2.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Ireland (2.0%, a difference of 0.29%), Cypriot (2.0%, a difference of 0.32%), and Immigrants from Ethiopia (2.0%, a difference of 0.47%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cambodians are Immigrants from Kuwait (2.0%, a difference of 0.29%), Zimbabwean (2.0%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Australia (1.9%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Turkey (1.9%, a difference of 0.44%), and Immigrants from Ireland (2.0%, a difference of 0.54%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Taiwanese | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Egyptians | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Mongolians | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.8 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Cambodians | 99.8 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 99.8 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Zimbabweans | 99.7 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.7 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Cypriots | 99.7 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 99.7 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.7 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Ethiopians | 99.7 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 99.7 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 2.0% |