Bhutanese vs Luxembourger Vision Disability
COMPARE
Bhutanese
Luxembourger
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Bhutanese
Luxembourgers
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
37th/ 347
METRIC RANK
1.9%
VISION DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
32nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs Luxembourger Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,984,678 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.063 and weighted average of 2.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,652,316 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.111 and weighted average of 1.9%, a difference of 1.1%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bhutanese | Luxembourger |
Minimum | 0.49% | 0.43% |
Maximum | 5.1% | 5.3% |
Range | 4.6% | 4.8% |
Mean | 2.0% | 1.7% |
Median | 1.8% | 1.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.5% | 1.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.2% | 2.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.74% | 0.84% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.77% | 0.90% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.76% | 0.89% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese and Luxembourgers by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Kuwait (2.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Zimbabwean (2.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Cambodian (2.0%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Ireland (2.0%, a difference of 0.29%), and Cypriot (2.0%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Mongolian (1.9%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Egypt (1.9%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Nepal (1.9%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from Turkey (1.9%, a difference of 0.43%), and Egyptian (1.9%, a difference of 0.47%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Taiwanese | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Egyptians | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Mongolians | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.8 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Cambodians | 99.8 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 99.8 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Zimbabweans | 99.7 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.7 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Cypriots | 99.7 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 99.7 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.7 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 2.0% |