Immigrants from Belarus vs Cambodian Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Belarus
 Cambodian
 Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Belarus
Cambodians
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
53rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
36th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Belarus vs Cambodian Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 150,159,443 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.084 and weighted average of 2.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,480,500 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Cambodians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.440 and weighted average of 2.0%, a difference of 2.0%.
 
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Belarus | Cambodian | 
| Minimum | 0.50% | 0.17% | 
| Maximum | 4.6% | 6.8% | 
| Range | 4.1% | 6.6% | 
| Mean | 1.9% | 2.1% | 
| Median | 1.9% | 1.8% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.6% | 1.3% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.2% | 2.2% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.52% | 0.90% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.82% | 1.6% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.81% | 1.5% | 
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Belarus and Cambodians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belarus are Macedonian (2.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Serbia (2.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Tongan (2.0%, a difference of 0.42%), Afghan (2.0%, a difference of 0.51%), and Latvian (2.0%, a difference of 0.57%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cambodians are Bhutanese (2.0%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Kuwait (2.0%, a difference of 0.29%), Zimbabwean (2.0%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Australia (1.9%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Turkey (1.9%, a difference of 0.44%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability | 
| Immigrants | Turkey | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 1.9% | 
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.8 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 1.9% | 
| Cambodians | 99.8 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 2.0% | 
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 2.0% | 
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 99.8 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 2.0% | 
| Zimbabweans | 99.7 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 2.0% | 
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.7 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 2.0% | 
| Cypriots | 99.7 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 2.0% | 
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 99.7 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 2.0% | 
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 2.0% | 
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.7 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 2.0% | 
| Ethiopians | 99.7 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 2.0% | 
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.7 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 2.0% | 
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.7 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 2.0% | 
| Israelis | 99.6 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 2.0% | 
| Latvians | 99.5 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 2.0% | 
| Afghans | 99.5 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 2.0% | 
| Tongans | 99.5 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 2.0% | 
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.4 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 2.0% | 
| Immigrants | Belarus | 99.3 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 2.0% | 
| Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 2.0% |