Bhutanese vs Cypriot Vision Disability
COMPARE
Bhutanese
Cypriot
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Bhutanese
Cypriots
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
37th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
41st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs Cypriot Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,984,678 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.063 and weighted average of 2.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,856,516 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Cypriots and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.371 and weighted average of 2.0%, a difference of 0.32%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bhutanese | Cypriot |
| Minimum | 0.49% | 0.21% |
| Maximum | 5.1% | 5.5% |
| Range | 4.6% | 5.3% |
| Mean | 2.0% | 2.2% |
| Median | 1.8% | 1.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.5% | 1.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.2% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.74% | 1.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.77% | 1.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.76% | 1.1% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese and Cypriots by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Kuwait (2.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Zimbabwean (2.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Cambodian (2.0%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Ireland (2.0%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Ethiopia (2.0%, a difference of 0.47%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cypriots are Immigrants from Ireland (2.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (2.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Zimbabwean (2.0%, a difference of 0.22%), Eastern European (2.0%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (2.0%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Egyptians | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Mongolians | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.8 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Cambodians | 99.8 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 99.8 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.7 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.7 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Cypriots | 99.7 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 99.7 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.7 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Ethiopians | 99.7 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.7 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.7 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Israelis | 99.6 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Latvians | 99.5 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 2.0% |