Greek vs New Zealander Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Greek
New Zealander
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Greeks
New Zealanders
3.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
3.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
230th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
6.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
219th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Greek vs New Zealander Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 482,523,980 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Greeks and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.513 and weighted average of 3.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,920,080 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.349 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 1.7%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Greek | New Zealander |
| Minimum | 1.0% | 0.53% |
| Maximum | 50.0% | 14.1% |
| Range | 49.0% | 13.6% |
| Mean | 6.5% | 4.3% |
| Median | 4.0% | 3.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.2% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.6% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 2.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.4% | 2.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.4% | 2.5% |
Demographics Similar to Greeks and New Zealanders by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Greeks are Luxembourger (3.2%, a difference of 0.23%), Ukrainian (3.2%, a difference of 0.28%), Maltese (3.2%, a difference of 0.51%), Immigrants from Portugal (3.2%, a difference of 0.62%), and Estonian (3.3%, a difference of 0.65%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Immigrants from Northern Europe (3.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Malaysian (3.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Laos (3.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Russian (3.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Oceania (3.2%, a difference of 0.10%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Australians | 8.1 /100 | #214 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Bangladeshis | 8.1 /100 | #215 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Russians | 7.1 /100 | #217 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 7.0 /100 | #218 | Tragic 3.2% |
| New Zealanders | 6.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Malaysians | 6.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 6.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 6.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Mexicans | 5.6 /100 | #223 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Icelanders | 5.2 /100 | #224 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Latvians | 5.1 /100 | #225 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Lebanese | 5.0 /100 | #226 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Bhutanese | 4.6 /100 | #227 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 4.3 /100 | #228 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Maltese | 4.1 /100 | #229 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Greeks | 3.2 /100 | #230 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Luxembourgers | 2.9 /100 | #231 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Ukrainians | 2.9 /100 | #232 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Estonians | 2.4 /100 | #233 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Central American Indians | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 3.3% |