Latvian vs New Zealander Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Latvian
New Zealander
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Latvians
New Zealanders
3.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
5.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
225th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
6.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
219th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Latvian vs New Zealander Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,695,390 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.748 and weighted average of 3.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,920,080 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.349 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 0.68%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Latvian | New Zealander |
| Minimum | 0.95% | 0.53% |
| Maximum | 17.1% | 14.1% |
| Range | 16.2% | 13.6% |
| Mean | 5.2% | 4.3% |
| Median | 4.1% | 3.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.2% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.9% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 2.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.2% | 2.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 2.5% |
Demographics Similar to Latvians and New Zealanders by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Icelander (3.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Lebanese (3.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Mexican (3.2%, a difference of 0.21%), Bhutanese (3.2%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Portugal (3.2%, a difference of 0.42%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Immigrants from Northern Europe (3.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Malaysian (3.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Laos (3.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Russian (3.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Oceania (3.2%, a difference of 0.10%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Pakistanis | 11.1 /100 | #212 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 10.5 /100 | #213 | Poor 3.1% |
| Australians | 8.1 /100 | #214 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Bangladeshis | 8.1 /100 | #215 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Russians | 7.1 /100 | #217 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 7.0 /100 | #218 | Tragic 3.2% |
| New Zealanders | 6.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Malaysians | 6.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 6.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 6.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Mexicans | 5.6 /100 | #223 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Icelanders | 5.2 /100 | #224 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Latvians | 5.1 /100 | #225 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Lebanese | 5.0 /100 | #226 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Bhutanese | 4.6 /100 | #227 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 4.3 /100 | #228 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Maltese | 4.1 /100 | #229 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Greeks | 3.2 /100 | #230 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Luxembourgers | 2.9 /100 | #231 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Ukrainians | 2.9 /100 | #232 | Tragic 3.2% |