Australian vs South American Indian Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Australian
 South American Indian
 Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Australians
South American Indians
3.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
8.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
214th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
86.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
127th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Australian vs South American Indian Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,103,986 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.262 and weighted average of 3.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,558,216 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.457 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 10.6%.
 
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Australian | South American Indian | 
| Minimum | 0.57% | 0.098% | 
| Maximum | 21.9% | 16.3% | 
| Range | 21.4% | 16.2% | 
| Mean | 4.6% | 4.1% | 
| Median | 3.7% | 4.0% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.1% | 2.8% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.8% | 4.8% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 2.0% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 2.6% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.6% | 2.6% | 
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Australians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Bangladeshi (3.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Norway (3.2%, a difference of 0.25%), Russian (3.2%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (3.2%, a difference of 0.37%), and New Zealander (3.2%, a difference of 0.43%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability | 
| Hispanics or Latinos | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 3.1% | 
| Immigrants | Latvia | 12.7 /100 | #208 | Poor 3.1% | 
| Immigrants | Hungary | 12.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 3.1% | 
| Cape Verdeans | 12.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 3.1% | 
| Romanians | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 3.1% | 
| Pakistanis | 11.1 /100 | #212 | Poor 3.1% | 
| Immigrants | Iraq | 10.5 /100 | #213 | Poor 3.1% | 
| Australians | 8.1 /100 | #214 | Tragic 3.2% | 
| Bangladeshis | 8.1 /100 | #215 | Tragic 3.2% | 
| Immigrants | Norway | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 3.2% | 
| Russians | 7.1 /100 | #217 | Tragic 3.2% | 
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 7.0 /100 | #218 | Tragic 3.2% | 
| New Zealanders | 6.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 3.2% | 
| Malaysians | 6.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 3.2% | 
| Immigrants | Laos | 6.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 3.2% | 
Demographics Similar to South American Indians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Immigrants from Western Asia (2.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Uganda (2.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Vietnam (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Kenya (2.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and Chilean (2.9%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability | 
| Jordanians | 89.5 /100 | #120 | Excellent 2.8% | 
| Cubans | 89.4 /100 | #121 | Excellent 2.8% | 
| Liberians | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 2.8% | 
| Immigrants | Zaire | 88.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 2.9% | 
| Bahamians | 88.6 /100 | #124 | Excellent 2.9% | 
| Immigrants | Albania | 88.5 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.9% | 
| Immigrants | Sudan | 87.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.9% | 
| South American Indians | 86.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.9% | 
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 86.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.9% | 
| Immigrants | Uganda | 86.6 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.9% | 
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.9% | 
| Immigrants | Kenya | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.9% | 
| Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.9% | 
| Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% | 
| Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |