Asian vs Immigrants from Jordan Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Asian
Immigrants from Jordan
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Asians
Immigrants from Jordan
2.3%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
71st/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.4%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
97.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
91st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Asian vs Immigrants from Jordan Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 549,189,639 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Asians and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.026 and weighted average of 2.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,224,885 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.232 and weighted average of 2.4%, a difference of 1.3%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Asian | Immigrants from Jordan |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 0.35% |
| Maximum | 4.9% | 5.6% |
| Range | 3.8% | 5.2% |
| Mean | 2.3% | 2.4% |
| Median | 2.2% | 2.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.0% | 2.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.5% | 2.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.47% | 0.64% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.47% | 0.80% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.47% | 0.80% |
Demographics Similar to Asians and Immigrants from Jordan by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Asians are Eastern European (2.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Egypt (2.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Switzerland (2.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Netherlands (2.3%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from China (2.3%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (2.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Congo (2.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Sierra Leonean (2.4%, a difference of 0.20%), Lithuanian (2.4%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (2.3%, a difference of 0.34%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
| Asians | 99.2 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 99.1 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 99.1 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 99.1 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | China | 99.1 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 99.0 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.0 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 99.0 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Chileans | 98.8 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Ugandans | 98.8 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 98.8 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Indians (Asian) | 98.7 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 98.7 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Estonians | 98.3 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 98.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 98.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Lithuanians | 98.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 98.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.7 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 97.7 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 2.4% |