Asian vs Chilean Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Asian
Chilean
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Asians
Chileans
2.3%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
71st/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.3%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
80th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Asian vs Chilean Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 549,189,639 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Asians and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.026 and weighted average of 2.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,527,062 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chileans and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.153 and weighted average of 2.3%, a difference of 0.45%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Asian | Chilean |
Minimum | 1.1% | 0.69% |
Maximum | 4.9% | 4.7% |
Range | 3.8% | 4.0% |
Mean | 2.3% | 2.2% |
Median | 2.2% | 2.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.0% | 1.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.5% | 2.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.47% | 0.57% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.47% | 0.79% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.47% | 0.78% |
Demographics Similar to Asians and Chileans by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Asians are Eastern European (2.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (2.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Egypt (2.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Zaire (2.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Norway (2.3%, a difference of 0.070%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Ugandan (2.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Denmark (2.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Indian (Asian) (2.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Spain (2.3%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Middle Africa (2.3%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
Brazilians | 99.3 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 99.3 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 2.3% |
South Africans | 99.3 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 99.2 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Norway | 99.2 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.2 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Asians | 99.2 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 99.1 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 99.1 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 99.1 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | China | 99.1 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 99.0 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.0 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 99.0 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Chileans | 98.8 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Ugandans | 98.8 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 98.8 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Indians (Asian) | 98.7 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Spain | 98.7 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Estonians | 98.3 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 2.3% |